Exploring the Hidden Flaws of EIFS: Why Dextall is the Future of Building Exteriors

In the world of modern construction, the materials chosen for exterior wall systems can make or break a building’ssafety, durability, and cost-efficiency. This article takes an in-depth look attwo popular choices: the traditional Exterior Insulation and Finish System (EIFS) and the innovative Dextall wall system. Through this exploration, we uncover why EIFS may not be the best solution and how Dextall emerges as asuperior alternative.

The Building Code Challenge

The 2022 update to the New York CityBuilding Code (NYC BC 2022) places a spotlight on the importance ofnoncombustible materials in construction, particularly in high-rise and urbanenvironments. Chapter 7, Section 703.5 of NYC BC 2022 mandates stringent noncombustibility tests for materials used in Type I, II, III, and IV construction, aiming to enhance fire safety and protect urban dwellers.

EIFS Under the Microscope

EIFS, commonly used for its insulation andfinish properties, incorporates foam plastic insulation—a material classifiedas combustible. To comply with NYC BC 2022, EIFS installations must includeadditional fireblocking at every floor and around openings. This requirement isnot just a minor detail but a critical safety measure. The need for fireblocking complicates installation, increases costs, and, if improperly executed, can pose significant safety risks.


Dextall’s Compliance Advantage

In contrast, Dextall’s wall system usesinherently noncombustible materials like aluminum, fiber cement, and stone.These materials naturally meet and exceed the noncombustibility standards setby ASTM E 136, aligning perfectly with NYC BC 2022 requirements. This means that buildings using Dextall do not need additional fireblocking, simplifying compliance and significantly enhancing fire safety. For builders and regulatorsalike, this is a game-changer, reducing both risk and complexity.


Fire Safety: A Critical Concern

Fire safety remains a top priority inconstruction, especially in densely populated urban areas. The potential for fire spread in buildings with combustible materials is a grave concern.

Dextall Project: The Heritage


The Risks with EIFS

EIFS, due to its foam plastic insulation, presents inherent fire risks. Although fireblocking can mitigate these risks,the potential for failure during installation or maintenance remains. High-risebuildings are particularly vulnerable, where fireblocking must be meticulouslymaintained at every floor level—a challenging and costly endeavor.


The Assurance of Dextall

Dextall’s use of noncombustible materialseliminates these fire risks. By not contributing to fire spread, Dextall enhances the overall safety of buildings. The absence of the need foradditional fireblocking simplifies the construction process and provides peaceof mind. In terms of fire safety, Dextall’s system is unequivocally superior.


Durability and Long-Term Performance

The durability and performance of buildingmaterials are crucial for the longevity and cost-efficiency of a structure. Here again, the differences between EIFS and Dextall are stark.


EIFS: Maintenance and Vulnerability

EIFS is susceptible to damage frommoisture, impact, and environmental wear. These vulnerabilities can lead tosignificant issues such as water infiltration, mold growth, and structuraldegradation. Regular maintenance is necessary to address these problems,increasing the total cost of ownership. According to industry reports, EIFS maintenance can add up to 15-20% of the initial installation cost annually.

Dextall Project: 1240 Bedford


Dextall: Built to Last

Dextall’s materials, including aluminum, fiber cement, and stone, offer superior durability. These materials resistmoisture, impact, and environmental wear, resulting in a longer lifespan withminimal maintenance requirements. Buildings constructed with Dextall’s systemare better equipped to withstand harsh weather conditions and daily wear and tear. This translates to significant cost savings over the building’s lifecycle, with maintenance costs potentially reduced by up to 50% compared to EIFS.


Installation and Cost Efficiency

The complexity of installation directlyimpacts labor costs and project timelines. Simplified installation processes can result in substantial savings.


The Complexity of EIFS

EIFS installation requires detailedattention to ensure proper fireblocking and moisture resistance. This complexity not only increases labor costs but also extends installation timelines. Mistakes during installation can lead to future issues, compounding costs and complicating compliance.


The Efficiency of Dextall

Dextall’s system is designed for ease of installation. The pre-fabricated panels are straightforward to install, reducing labor costs and accelerating construction timelines. Builders using Dextall report savings of up to 30% on labor costs and significantly faster project completion times. This efficiency not only lowers initial construction costs but also minimizes the risk of installation errors, offering a clear advantage over EIFS.

Dextall Project: The Heritage

Navigating Regulatory Compliance

Compliance with building codes is acritical aspect of construction. Non-compliance can lead to legal issues andsafety hazards.


The Regulatory Burden of EIFS

EIFS must adhere to strict fireblocking and noncombustibility requirements as outlined in NYC BC 2022. These requirementsadd layers of complexity and cost to the construction process. Builders must be diligent in their compliance efforts to avoid potential safety hazards and legal repercussions. Non-compliance can result in fines, legal disputes, and increased insurance premiums.


The Compliance Simplicity of Dextall

Dextall’s use of noncombustible materials naturally meets the stringent requirements of NYC BC 2022. This inherent compliance simplifies the regulatory process, reducing the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties. Builders can focus on other aspects ofthe project, confident that their exterior wall system meets the highest safety standards.

Environmental Impact: A Growing Concern

Sustainability is becoming a central focusin construction, driven by regulatory pressures and growing environmental awareness.

Dextall Project: The Heritage
The Environmental Cost of EIFS

Foam plastic insulation, a key component ofEIFS, has a significant environmental impact due to its production process anddisposal challenges. The need for frequent maintenance and replacement further exacerbates this impact. Studies show that EIFS can contribute to increasedcarbon footprints and waste generation.

Dextall’s Sustainable Solution

Dextall’s system uses recyclable materials such as aluminum and stone, contributing to more sustainable building practices. The durability of Dextall panels reduces the need for frequentrepairs and replacements, minimizing environmental impact. Buildings using Dextallalign with LEED certification requirements, promoting sustainable construction and reducing the overall environmental footprint.


Through this exploration, it becomes evident that Dextall’s wall system offers numerous advantages over EIFS. From superior fire safety and durability to simplified compliance andsustainability, Dextall stands out as the superior choice for modern construction. Its noncombustible materials ensure compliance with the stringent NYC BC 2022 without additional measures, providing a safer, more efficient, andenvironmentally friendly solution.

As urban construction continues to evolve, the adoption of safer, more durable, and sustainable materials is paramount. Dextall’s innovative wall system meets these demands, offering a compelling alternative to traditional EIFS. For builders, regulators, and occupants alike,the choice is clear: Dextall is the future of exterior wall systems.

Dextall uses cookies to provide you with the best experience.
For more information, please see our privacy policy.